image of library

LLN Commons Current Issue

LLN Commons
Archive

Not a Subscriber?
Learn More

Subscribe Now

LLN Leadership Articles




Leadership Development:  A Teachable Point of View

In this concise article, Maureen Sullivan suggests a simple way to organize your vision for your library and use the resulting “story”  as a framework for planning and activities.


September, 2007 LLN Peer Panel
While recently blogging around, we came across an interesting recap of an ALA/LITA session entitled “The Ultimate Debate: Do Libraries Innovate?” This panel, moderated by Andrew Pace, featured Karen Schneider (FSU), Stephen Abram (SirsiDynix), and our own Joe Janes (UW).  The blog was essentially a write-up of the discussion, and well done (by Julie Bauder, a student in the MLIS program at Wayne State).   One paragraph in particular jumped out at us:
 
“Throughout the debate, Karen and Stephen emphasized two overarching theories for why libraries have trouble innovating.  For Karen, the problem is that libraries don’t have the resources to be able to support failure, and if you can’t accept the possibility of failure you can’t innovate: innovation is risky and uncertain.  For Stephen, the problem is within the culture of librarianship, which he says is a culture of victimization.  Libraries share disaster stories and commiserate over low salaries and other challenges, and then they come to believe that these disaster stories are the reality of all of librarianship and don’t even try to change it.”
 
Thus, we asked the Peer Panel the following questions:
  • Do you agree with either (or both) of these theories?
  • If so, what can be done to foster much-needed innovation in libraries?
  • If not, what are some good examples of library innovation (yours or somebody else’s) and what can librarians learn from it?


June, 2006 LLN Peer Panel

Well, most of us are about to pack our bags and go spend a few days (or longer) in a place that is hot and muggy.  Which is to say that it’s time for another ALA Annual Conference!
 
So this month we asked our panelists to explain what motivates them to attend ALA and other similar conferences:

•    Why do you go/not go to ALA (PLA, ACRL and other similar large gatherings)?
•    What do you see as the value of ALA (et.al.) to current and future library leaders?
•    What conferences are of greatest value to you?  Why?
•    How would you like to see the ALA conference change?
•    What other relevant comments would you care to make?


Holt Perspectives:  Learning from Others

In this "Perspectives" column, Glen Holt examines several topics that kept his interest during his brief vacation. (May 8, 2007)

January, 2007 LLN Peer Panel


We begin the New Year with a discussion of a provocative Op-Ed that appeared recently in The Wall Street Journal.  In it, the author, John J. Miller challenges the existence and sustainability of libraries, saying they serve only as “welfare programs for the middle class.” The full piece, which we recommend you read, can be found at the WSJ site:  http://www.opinionjournal.com/forms/printThis.html?id=110009472 

With the article as backdrop, then, we asked our peerless panel to comment on Mr. Miller’s essay, citing points of agreement and disagreement.  Per usual, we were not disappointed by the panel’s response.


Holt's Perspectives

February 16, 2007:  Awake in Seattle:  Observations of a Convention Goer
As he traipsed about Seattle and the ALA Midwinter conference, Glen Holt saw a number of things—good and bad—that library leaders can learn from.   He shares his observations with you in this enjoyable narrative.

January 15, 2007:  Questions on my Mind for ALA Midwinter
The ALA does a wonderful job of telling us what to see and where to eat while at the Midwinter conference in Seattle.  Glen Holt goes a step or two further by suggesting what you might want to be thinking about before, during, and after the conference.


November, 2006 LLN Peer Panel

Over the course of the last many months, and most recently in last week’s “screed” from George Needham, we have heard mention of Mentoring.  So this month, I asked the Peer Panel for their views on this topic, with special attention to the following questions:
  • What mentoring experiences have been valuable to you, either as a mentor or mentee?  In discussing these experiences, please highlight why they were of value and what made them work.
  • Have your mentoring experiences always involved people within the library world? Or have you observed (or been a part of) programs or instances where the mentor and mentee worked in different fields? 
  • Do you feel that mentoring programs work, or is it best to let mentor/mentee relationships form naturally and evolve without the aid of a formal framework?  Why?

Forget the Opac, Why Does Library Management Suck?

George Needham has been a keen observer of libraries and their management for years.  In this measured--but very direct—essay (a “screed,” according to George), he discusses the shortcomings of many managers and suggests the “hard questions” we should be asking ourselves.  Finally he makes a most compelling case for mentoring as a key in encouraging and developing our future library leaders. (November 1, 2006)


Summer, 2006 LLN Peer Panel

The topic of discussion this month is Change Management.  Change is, of course, inevitable, and in recent years we have witnessed a tremendous amount of environmental (especially technological) change that has put pressure on “public” institutions like libraries to either quickly adapt or become increasingly marginalized.  And as much as we would like it to be the case, organizational change doesn’t automatically follow environmental change.  The result of this is that change management has become a big topic and has attracted a great deal of energy in the form of research, new consultancies, and tons of literature (some of it helpful!).

We asked our panel to comment on change management, citing their personal experiences and observations.


Holt Perspectives: Is DC Public Ready for Its Renaissance?

 August 22, 2006: Part 4
Glen Holt concludes his series on the District of Columbia Public Library by recounting recent dramatic events and discussing the success factors and players involved in the hoped-for renaissance.

 August 8, 2006: Part 3
In Part 3 of his essay on the Washington, D.C. Public Library, Glen Holt discusses the Blueprint authored by the mayor’s taskforce.  The devil is in the details, of course, and Glen is fast to point out the many challenges new director Ginnie Cooper and her staff face as they make the Blueprint into a living, breathing, and hopefully successful, library.

 August 1, 2006: Part 2
We continue with the saga of the Washington D.C. Public Library.  In Part 2 (of 4), Glen Holt makes it clear that it takes a lot more than money to create a great library system.  The funds are flowing in our nation’s capital, but many managerial challenges await new director Ginnie Cooper.

June 10, 2006 :Part 1
The late banker Walter Wriston would often (off the record) refer to Washington D.C. as “Disney World North.”  Indeed, everything that happens “inside the beltway” is magnified beyond proportion--often grotesquely--by a combination of politicians, power, money and a media on steroids.  And the effort to bring about a “renaissance” of the D.C. Public Library System is not immune from this phenomenon.  In this first of a series, Glen Holt explores the background of this renaissance: the people and the politics involved with this most visible institution.  Subsequent installments will deal with the varying views concerning the desired outcomes of this renaissance and explore the critical question: “Will the residents of DC get the great library system they need and deserve?"  While Washington D.C. is certainly a "special" environment, we think you will find a number of parallels with the issues faced by all library leaders, regardless of library type and size.


Frankly Speaking: Managing Number One free



Holt Perspectives:

March 9, 2006:  We're Number One! We're Number One! We're Number One!
In this Perspective, Glen Holt takes some issue with the various rankings that make waves in the library community.  He thoroughly dissects the methods behind them and reminds us of what truly matters as we look at the role our libraries play--both now and in the future.


Frankly Speaking:  Libraries in the Flat World



Closing the Deal

Our recent article about Thomas Friedman's book, The World Is Flat, received an immediate response from Jamie LaRue, a member of the LLN Peer Panel.  Jamie noted that not all of us are card-carrying extroverts, and thus may be a bit reticent about the "sales" responsibilities we have as part of our jobs.  His article talks about his own experiences in a humorous and helpful way. (March 22, 2006)


Risk, Luck and Serendipity

Risk is a four letter word, but without risk-taking there would be little progress, only stagnation. With this in mind, Buff Hirko talks forcefully about the need for library leaders to take risk in order to create greater relevance and success. (April 18, 2006)


Leadership
The concept of leadership has long been the subject of many writings, speeches and discussions.  As it is the key word in our name, the Library Leadership Network is pleased to present the insights of Nancy Bolt, herself a proven leader in the library community.  In discussing leadership, Nancy takes a fresh and informal approach, one that is relevant to those who manage libraries.  Topics such as leadership typically defy consensus, and we hope that our readers will share their views on the topic as Nancy continues to address it in subsequent articles. (November 17, 2005)

What Makes a Library Great?

In the June Preview issue of The LLN Commons, Glen Holt got our attention with “Asking the Right, But Hard Questions.”  In “What Makes a Library Great?” he responds to those questions by outlining the criteria that define successful libraries and the importance of measurement in objectively assessing their “greatness.”  In his introduction, Glen notes that: “Our times call for great libraries,” ones that “innovate in their use of new tools” and do not “repeat ceaselessly our old ways of thinking and doing.”  Although written from the point of view of the public library (Glen is the recently-retired Executive Director of the one in St. Louis), Glen’s message applies to libraries of all types and sizes. (Sepetmber 8, 2005)

Asking the Right, But Hard Questions free


The “Keynote” article of the premier issue of The Library Leadership Network Commons is “Asking the Right but Hard Questions,” by Glen Holt.  Glen sets the tone for this and subsequent issues of The LLN Commons by posing critical questions which library professionals must address as they seek to differentiate their services and remain relevant in the years to come.  Where mediocrity exists, it must be replaced by criticality.  In order to accomplish this, we will need to focus not only on what we do, but the successful results that come from what we do.